After posting last week about the importance of deadlines, I blew my self-imposed noon Saturday deadlines for these Week in Review posts. The Big Deadline, though, was Sunday morning’s message-in-lieu-of-a-sermon at Middlebury Congregational Church. I was literally rewriting the introduction at 5 a.m. for a 10:00 service and livestream.
That essay/message was unusually challenging and went through many rewrites and edits over two months. That’s partly because identity is such a personal and sensitive topic. It’s also because it involves some sensitive past history that I share with others who may see the video or read the essay. But I stand by my main point: We, as a world and a world, need to look less at what makes us different and more at what we have in common.
At about the time for my noon Saturday deadline, we were in Old Saybrook, Conn., at the Kate, the Katharine Hepburn Cultural Arts Center. We toured the small museum devoted to the town’s star citizen, who died in 2003. The museum and box office have posted open hours of Tuesday through Friday, but it’s apparently open at other times when they have shows. On this Saturday they were showing an art film, “Pissarro: Father of Impressionism,” so we stayed for that.
Coincidentally, we were in the area en route to a program on American Art in the Gilded Age at Ochre Court in Newport, R.I. The Impressionists in France were contemporaries of the American nouveau riche of the Gilded Age, who scorned the artistic newcomers in favor of more Rococo or Classical style art. So this bit of serendipity added context, which is essential to any good writing or presentation.
Ochre Court, now the main administrative building for Salve Regina University, happens to be on Newport’s Cliff Walk near the ostentatiously lavish Vanderbilt mansion The Breakers. Just the night before, we had viewed a documentary about the Vanderbilt dynasty that helped put it into context.
Serendipity is one of the creative tools a writer has to pull things together into context.
Observations: As of mid-summer, I’ve had more visitors than in any full year prior. It’s a modest milestone but it does show that you reap what you sow.
Interaction: A Facebook friend who has several very successful travel and enthusiast blogs congratulated me on the milestone and observed that building an audience takes time. Author and fellow blogger J.M. Gifford found “Fun With Venn Diagrams” “clever, entertaining, and philosophical.” I suspect that other Friends on Facebook thought I was sharing only the featured image of an editorial cartoon about Venn diagrams rather than original content.
Professional development: Finished listening to/ reading two (audio)books about conflict that were helpful in “Fun With Venn Diagrams.” Will post reviews this week here and on Amazon, Goodreads, and Audible.
Next week: Publish the conflict reviews. With “Margery” research materials still in Vermont, move to an alternate project. “He Said, She Said” seems timely and the reading on handling conflict will tie nicely into it.
In case you missed it …
Puff and fluff, 1979
Reading Time: 2 minutes Any local news editor understands the delicate balance between what readers and advertisers expect and what you think is important.
In Other Words … Season 2, Episode 19
Reading Time: 2 minutes Many people don’t even have the time or focus for an entire book. The culture of short videos and podcasts has taken over, to our detriment.
Top-of-the-head inventory, 1979
Reading Time: 2 minutes “Items in Stock” was, in truth, a misnomer. Some were complete, or ready for a final draft or a rewrite. Others were ideas or characters in search of a plot.
Award-winning coverage? (1979)
Reading Time: 3 minutes Newspapers have associations, which sponsor competitions. But it’s a long trip from “thinking of sending it” to actually receiving an award.
A dead-end job? (1979)
Reading Time: 2 minutes Now, Howard. Listen carefully. It’s important to be honest with a potential employer. But there’s such a thing as being TOO honest.
One thought on “Week in Review: Week 29”